This article comes at the perfect time. Your opening premise, that Metaphysics IS Physics, is incredibly insightful. I appreciate this analytical aproach to complex ideas. It's vital to challenge outdated interpretations of science. I compleetly agree with your core argument.
I had a dog years ago that knew what was I thinking.Specifically, he loved to go with in the car. If I decided ahead of time that he’s was coming with me he would go to the door and wait.
If I had decided he was not going he’d would just keep laying where he was at .
This happened many times. I believe I projected an image to him.No one can explain this away to me as not possible.
Thats the thing: these ideas have empirical backing. Cleve Backster could generate measurable reaction in PLANTS by thinking about destroying them. And he did it over and over and over, for anyone with an interest. Yet his work was ostracized. If science is a virtue then that behavior is a paradigmatic sin.
This article comes at the perfect time. Your opening premise, that Metaphysics IS Physics, is incredibly insightful. I appreciate this analytical aproach to complex ideas. It's vital to challenge outdated interpretations of science. I compleetly agree with your core argument.
I had a dog years ago that knew what was I thinking.Specifically, he loved to go with in the car. If I decided ahead of time that he’s was coming with me he would go to the door and wait.
If I had decided he was not going he’d would just keep laying where he was at .
This happened many times. I believe I projected an image to him.No one can explain this away to me as not possible.
I lived it.
Thats the thing: these ideas have empirical backing. Cleve Backster could generate measurable reaction in PLANTS by thinking about destroying them. And he did it over and over and over, for anyone with an interest. Yet his work was ostracized. If science is a virtue then that behavior is a paradigmatic sin.